
Daily Cybersecurity News - January 22, 2026
Pwn2Own Automotive 2026: Hackers Exploit 29 Zero-Day Vulnerabilities
Executive Summary
On the second day of Pwn2Own Automotive 2026, hackers exploited 29 new zero-day vulnerabilities. This brings the event's cumulative total to 66 unique zero-days and $955,750 in prize money. The vulnerabilities are currently unpatched and actively exploited within the contest environment.
Vulnerability Details
- Affected Product: Automotive systems, including connected vehicles and electric vehicle chargers
- Identifier: N/A
- CVSS Score: N/A
- Exploitation Status: Actively Exploited
Risk & Impact
- Triage: Immediate action is required due to the active exploitation of these vulnerabilities.
- Attack Vector: The attack vectors vary but include exploiting vulnerabilities in infotainment systems and EV chargers.
- Ease of Exploit: The ease of exploitation varies depending on the vulnerability, but the success of the Pwn2Own competition demonstrates that skilled researchers can successfully exploit these flaws.
Action Plan
- Immediate Action: Apply patches as soon as vendors release them. Upgrade to the latest software versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
- Workaround: Implement network segmentation and intrusion detection systems to monitor and potentially block malicious activity.
- Detection: Monitor systems for unusual activity and review security logs for potential indicators of compromise (IOCs).
Relevant professional terms
- Zero-Day Vulnerability
- A software flaw that is unknown to the vendor and for which no patch is available, making it susceptible to immediate exploitation.
- Exploit
- A technique or piece of code that takes advantage of a vulnerability in a system to cause unintended behavior, such as gaining unauthorized access or executing malicious code.
Source: Bleeping Computer
Cisco Fixes Unified Communications RCE Zero-Day Exploited in Attacks
HighExecutive Summary
Cisco has released patches for a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability, CVE-2026-20045, affecting its Unified Communications products and Webex Calling Dedicated Instance, which has been actively exploited as a zero-day vulnerability. The vulnerability allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of a susceptible device.
Vulnerability Details
- Affected Product: Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM), Unified CM Session Management Edition (SME), Unified CM IM and Presence Service, Cisco Unity Connection, and Webex Calling Dedicated Instance
- Identifier: CVE-2026-20045
- CVSS Score: 8.2 (High)
- Exploitation Status: Actively Exploited
Risk & Impact
- Triage: Critical, due to the potential for privilege escalation to root.
- Attack Vector: By sending a sequence of crafted HTTP requests to the web-based management interface of an affected device.
- Ease of Exploit: An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject malicious input that results in arbitrary command execution.
Action Plan
- Immediate Action: Remediation is version-specific:Unified CM 12.5: No direct patch is available. Users must migrate to a supported version (e.g., v14) immediately. Unified CM 14: Upgrade to 14SU5 or apply the specific patch file (ciscocm.V14SU4a...). Unified CM 15: The fixed release (15SU4) is delayed until March 2026. Users must apply the interim patch file immediately.
- Workaround: There are currently no workarounds.
- Detection: Monitor for suspicious HTTP requests to the web-based management interface of the affected devices.
Relevant professional terms
- Remote Code Execution (RCE)
- A type of vulnerability that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on a target system from a remote location.
- Privilege Escalation
- The ability of an attacker to gain higher-level access rights or permissions on a system, potentially leading to full control.
Source: Bleeping Computer
Under Armour Breach: Everest Ransomware
Executive Summary
Under Armour suffered a ransomware attack in November 2025, with customer data surfacing on the dark web in January 2026. The Everest ransomware group claimed responsibility, exfiltrating and leaking sensitive data after an unpaid ransom.
Attack Overview
- Attack Path: The Everest group claims to have exfiltrated over 343 GB of sensitive data.
- Attacker:Everest Ransomware Group
Impact Assessment
- Data Stolen: 343 GB of data, including 72.7 million email addresses, names, dates of birth, genders, physical addresses, purchase histories, and passport details (indicating potential exposure of HR records or VIP customer travel data).
Strategic Takeaway
The incident highlights the increasing risk of data exfiltration and public data leaks associated with ransomware attacks on retail companies.
Relevant professional terms
- Ransomware
- A type of malware that encrypts a victim's files, and the attacker demands a ransom to restore access.
- Data Exfiltration
- The unauthorized transfer of data from a computer or network to an external location.
Source: Malwarebytes
LastPass Phishing Campaign Targets Vault Backups
Executive Summary
A phishing campaign is targeting LastPass users with emails instructing them to back up their vaults within 24 hours. The attackers aim to harvest master passwords by redirecting victims to a fake LastPass domain.
Key TTPs
- Initial Access: Phishing emails with subjects referencing maintenance and urging users to back up their vaults.
- Execution: Users are tricked into clicking a link within the email, redirecting them to a fake LastPass domain.
- Defense Evasion: The campaign was launched over a U.S. holiday weekend to exploit reduced security staffing.
Campaign Analysis
The phishing campaign attempts to create a sense of urgency, a common tactic in social engineering attacks. If successful, attackers gain access to sensitive user data, including usernames, passwords, and financial information.
Targeting & Infrastructure
- Target Profile: LastPass customers are the target.
- Infrastructure: The phishing infrastructure includes compromised AWS S3 infrastructure and spoofed domains.
Actionable Intelligence
- IPs:
52.95.155[.]90,104.21.86[.]78,172.67.216[.]232,188.114.97[.]3,148.222.54[.]15 - Domains:
mail-lastpass[.]com,lastpassdesktop[.]com,lastpassgazette[.]blog
Relevant Terms
- Phishing: A type of social engineering attack where attackers impersonate legitimate entities to trick individuals into revealing sensitive information.
- Social Engineering: The use of deception to manipulate individuals into divulging confidential or personal information that may be used for fraudulent purposes.
Source: Malwarebytes
LOLBins Used to Deploy RATS
Executive Summary
Attackers are using multiple LOLBins (Living Off The Land Binaries) to deploy Remcos RAT and NetSupport Manager on compromised systems. The campaign leverages legitimate Windows tools to evade detection while establishing remote access.
Key TTPs
- Initial Access: Exploiting
forfiles.exeto executemshta.exe, downloading malicious content from a remote server. - Execution: Utilizing
mshta.exe,curl,tar, scripting engines,reg, andexpandto execute malicious code. - Defense Evasion: Employing LOLBins to masquerade malicious activity as legitimate system processes, bypassing traditional security measures.
Campaign Analysis
The attacker's heavy reliance on LOLBins demonstrates a determined effort to blend malicious activity with normal system operations. This approach increases the complexity for detection, requiring vigilant monitoring of potential LOLBin abuse.
Targeting & Infrastructure
- Target Profile: Systems running Windows.
Actionable Intelligence
- IPs:
79.141.162.189
Relevant Terms
- LOLBins: Legitimate operating system binaries used by attackers for malicious purposes.
- RAT: Remote Access Trojan, a type of malware that allows an attacker to control a system remotely.
Source: Malwarebytes
LLMs Enhance Real-Time Phishing Attacks
Executive Summary
A novel AI-augmented attack method leverages LLM services to generate dynamic code in real time within a browser, enabling malicious webpages to conduct phishing attacks. This represents a new frontier in runtime assembly attacks.
Key Findings
- Attackers are using LLMs to generate malicious JavaScript variants at scale.
- LLMs can rewrite or hide existing malicious code, making it harder for traditional detection systems to spot.
- Attackers are disguising payloads with business language within SVG files to avoid detection.
The Bottom Line
The increasing use of LLMs in generating dynamic phishing code poses a significant threat because it allows for real-time adaptation and evasion of traditional security measures. Security teams need to focus on advanced detection techniques that can identify malicious behavior generated by AI, as static analysis and signature-based approaches become less effective against these evolving threats. This requires continuous retraining of detection models with LLM-generated samples and implementing dynamic analysis to understand the runtime behavior of code.
Relevant Terms
- Runtime Assembly: The process of constructing executable code during the execution of a program, often used to generate dynamic content or adapt to changing conditions.
- Phishing: A type of online fraud where attackers impersonate legitimate entities to trick individuals into revealing sensitive information such as usernames, passwords, and credit card details.
Source: Unit 42
LLMs Susceptible to Prompt Injection Attacks
Executive Summary
Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, where malicious instructions embedded in user inputs can override intended programming and cause unintended behavior. This exploit takes advantage of the model's inability to differentiate between developer-defined prompts and user inputs.
Key Findings
- Attackers can manipulate AI behavior by embedding malicious instructions into an AI's input field.
- LLMs with web browsing capabilities are susceptible to indirect prompt injection, where adversarial prompts are embedded within website content.
- Prompt injection attacks can lead to various consequences, including the distribution of malicious content.
The Bottom Line
The ongoing vulnerability of LLMs to prompt injection attacks highlights a critical need for improved security measures. As AI systems become more integrated into sensitive areas, the potential for malicious actors to exploit these vulnerabilities increases, potentially leading to data breaches, misinformation, and compromised decision-making processes. Addressing this issue requires a multi-faceted approach, including enhanced input validation, better AI training, and continuous monitoring for malicious prompts.
Relevant Terms
- Prompt Injection: A cybersecurity exploit where malicious inputs manipulate AI models to cause unintended behavior.
- LLM (Large Language Model): An AI model trained on vast amounts of text data, designed to understand and generate human-like text.
Source: schneier.com